Project activities were initiated on September 1, 2020, and an initial project kickoff meeting was held September 17, 2020. The Technology Maturation Plan, as well as the Data Management Plan have been submitted on time. DNV GL delivered their BP2 continuation presentation on 7/28/2021, which was well-received, and theTechnology Manager approved the DNV GL continuation to BP2. The Go/No-go decision point to proceed to BP2 was accomplished on time and within budget.
In Budget Period 2 (BP2), Two new density functional theory (DFT) models, developed for estimating corrosion resistance of alloys, were employed to further evaluate the hypothetical corrosion resistance provided by the proposed aluminum alloys and low alloy steels. The first model approach was designed to estimate the effect of alloying on changes in the corrosion potential (i.e., the potential on the galvanic series). The second model approach was designed to estimate the effectiveness of passivation processes on alloys (the chloride or corrosion susceptibility index, CSI). Specific alloys were selected from alloys which were commercially available, although some wider-ranging searches were also employed.
In BP2, DNV focused on fabricating and laboratory testing a field deployable and instrumented metal coupon that has a simulated repair area coated with a different coating. Several sacrificial and corrosion resistant alloys were tested and carried through to BP2. The best sacrificial alloy was found to be an Al-MG alloy and the best corrosion resistant alloy was a Fe-Cr-MO alloy. Laboratory testing of the corrosion resistant alloys was employed by both gas metal arch welding and flame spraying onto test coupons for laboratory corrosion testing. The corrosion resistant Fe-Cr-MO alloy was welded to a test coupon and the Al-MG sacrificial alloy was flame sprayed onto a test coupon. These were corrosion tested in the laboratory and found to be very good candidates for de-aerated soil slurry testing which was done in a lab-scale soil box. These coatings were tested and compared to pipeline steel grade X52 and the results for the spray coating were slightly better than the welded coating in the aerated and de-aerated soil slurry tests.