- Completed a survey of carbonate rock formations to develop a database of potential storage reservoir locations,
- Completed economic, market, and environmental analyses,
- Completed Phase 1 Final Report, and
- Completed review of current acid dissolution and hydraulic fracturing models.
At the start of the project, data for carbonate producing formations was compiled using the gas atlases for the Rocky Mountains, Texas, Mid-Continent, and Appalachian regions. The compilation included averages and ranges of porosity, permeability, depth, and thickness. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software was used to produce integrated maps (structural contour, depth to top of carbonate, thickness, occurrence of carbonate over specific depth ranges, and occurrence of limestone over specific depth ranges) for each of the carbonate units.
To analyze the dissolution process' potential for creating storage volume, the following aspects were examined: weight and volume of rock to be dissolved; gas storage volume, pressure, and temperature at depth; rock solubility; and acid costs. Hydrochloric acid was selected because of low cost, high acid solubility, fast reaction rates with carbonate rock, and highly soluble products (calcium chloride) that allow for the easy removal of calcium waste from the well. Despite certain advantages over inorganic acids, the cost of using organic acids was determined to be prohibitive.
A design was developed for the dissolution process that incorporates proven technologies for drilling wells, storing and pumping inorganic acids, and treating the aqueous waste streams exiting the underground storage cavern. A preliminary economic analysis of the design considered capital costs, well-design options and costs, waste treatment options, and comparison with other gas storage options. Optimum rock type and rock properties, which varied significantly with depth, were identified. Results of this analysis revealed that the fracture-acid dissolution method is competitive with other methods of creating underground storage.
Design considerations and economic calculations indicate that fracturing and dissolution can be applied most advantageously to carbonate formations deeper than 4000 feet, with limestone at depths between 6000 and 9000 feet the preferred choice. Large areas of West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and New York were found to be potentially suitable for developing gas storage in carbonate rock using this technology.