Performers
BC Technologies, Ltd, LLC, Laramie, WY
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN

Results
Phase one of the research is nearly complete. Based upon laboratory research conducted by ORNL a preliminary design of a field ready prototype has been completed. Initial research by ORNL using carbon dioxide and simulated saline produced water defined the concept and verified the concept feasible for significantly reducing salt concentrations in the water. Initial laboratory tests conducted showed the hydrate process capable of reducing the salt level in the synthetic produced water from 35,000 to 2,000 ppm.

In addition, background work, such as operator surveys, database searches, and literature review have been completed. The literature survey involved locating and reviewing applicable NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) documents, such as Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements, that were completed by producers with CBNG leases in the Greater Green River Basin (GGRB). An extensive listing is provided in a report, which will be used by the project team and provided to DOE/NETL. The NEPA documents are available electronically on the Wyoming Bureau of Land Management website (http://www.wy.blm.gov" [external site]).

A review of the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (WOGCC) databases was completed to acquire well data on permitted CBNG wells in the GGRB. In October-November 2005, data from the website (http://wogcc.state.wy.us/) were downloaded and entered into an Access database developed by BCT personnel. This database was checked and updated in December 2005, April 2006, and November 2006. Additional updates continued through the spring and summer of 2007 to add new wells and update production statistics. Tracking the well data in this fashion has provided considerable useful data on the level of permitting activity, operators, well locations, well depths, producing formations, production activity, and to a limited extent, water quality data for currently producing CBNG wells in the basin. This database will continue to be updated periodically until it is used to identify a suitable producing CBNG well in the GGRB for the field demonstration.

Additional, laboratory-scale experiments have been conducted by ORNL using the synthetic brines and varied gas compositions. Methane hydrate formation was investigated in a series of laboratory-scale experiments, propane hydrate formation in another series and a final series in which a gas mixture of 95% methane and 5% propane was used to form the hydrate. Successful hydrate formation was achieved using each of the three gas mixtures. Safety, economic and technical factors are currently being considered to determine the final hydrate to be produced.

ORNL is currently using the data generated thus far to optimize the performance of their continuous-jet hydrate reactor (CJHR). Once this is completed they will undertake lab testing of hydrate formation using actual field brine. In closing, ORNL also communicated results of laboratory-scale experiments and provided BC Technologies, Ltd. (BCT) with a CJHR for initiation of prototype development. For additional information regarding the ORNL research please contact Costas Tsouris (tsourisc@ornl.gov or 865-241-3246).

BCT personnel continued prototype development and started bench-scale experiments in 2007. The primary issues to be addressed were how to operate the CJHR in a continuous or semi-batch mode and the design of the heat transfer systems required for hydrate formation and gas/treated water/brine separation during hydrate dissociation.

The CJHR was originally designed by ORNL to discharge hydrate into the deep ocean where substantial pressure exists. In effect, the CJHR discharges into a vessel operating at elevated pressure in the ORNL laboratory-scale experiments. Keeping the hydrate under pressure during dissociation causes operating difficulties related to gas/treated water/brine separation during hydrate dissociation and is difficult to envision in continuous or semi-batch mode operation. Further, the high pressures required by the process and relatively low hydrate density desired would require very expensive equipment to hold the hydrate under pressure during dissociation. However, the CJHR is compact and it was decided to determine if the CJHR could be operated under pressure to form hydrates that could be discharged into low pressure vessels for dissociation. To achieve this objective, an adjustable gas spring and a cone were added to the CJHR outlet to maintain the desired pressure inside the CJHR .

Next, it was decided that control of the initial dissociation of the hydrate could be achieved and controlled by controlling the temperature in the first dissociation chamber. Brine and gas from hydrate dissociation can be easily separated and collected in the first chamber. The remaining solids (hydrates) can then be transferred to a final dissociation chamber where the hydrate is rapidly dissociated using warm water and remaining gas is collected.

Three heat exchange systems were designed for hydrate formation and gas/treated water/brine separation during hydrate dissociation. The first refrigeration system utilizes a standard refrigerant compressor. The compressed refrigerant is cooled and condensed by heating the hydrate produced. The condensed refrigerant is then evaporated cooling a glycol/water solution. The cooled glycol water solution flows into the next heat exchange system and is used to cool the feed water to be treated to a temperature greater than 0°C and less than 8 °C. The glycol/water mixture is used as the feed water cooling media to prevent freezing in the refrigerant evaporators and the feed water heat exchanger. The glycol/water mixture also allows the feed water heat exchanger to operate with an efficient driving force of 5 °C even when a 1°C water temperature is desired. The third heat exchange system also utilizes a standard refrigerant compressor but the compressed refrigerant is air cooled. This refrigeration system is used to control gas temperature in the hydrate collection chamber which operates at atmospheric pressure.

Construction of a bench-scale simulator was initiated in summer 2007 and tested in 2008. After a lengthy shakedown and modification period, production of carbon dioxide hydrate in the atmospheric chamber was achieved (Figures 3-10). Current plans are to complete additional modifications of the bench-scale simulator, conduct simulations of hydrate dissociation to determine brine and treated water yields and qualities, complete the design of the gas collection and recompression systems, design the prototype and construct the prototype. Then we plan to determine economic feasibility of the water treatment process prior to proceeding to Phase 3: the field demonstration of the prototype unit .

Benefits
A new, lower-cost treatment for CBNG produced water will reduce environmental compliance and disposal costs, and provide water for beneficial use in arid regions of the United States.

Background
U.S. oil production includes an average 10 barrels of water for each barrel of oil produced. Handling and disposal of this water is the single greatest environmental impediment to domestic oil production. Especially large volumes of produced water are generated in the Western States in association with oil and gas activities. High levels of total dissolved solids (TDS) make much of this water unsuitable for use, and it is economically infeasible to treat the water. However, a significant portion of the produced water, particularly water from CBNG development, has sufficiently low TDS levels to be used “as is” or to make treatment a feasible option.

There is tremendous need to turn wastewater from oil and gas operations into a useful product. Developing beneficial uses for produced water could reduce the costs of hydrocarbon development in the Western United States, thus increasing the Nation’s economically recoverable oil and gas resources. In addition, the produced water can be used to offset problems created by near-record drought conditions in recent years, develop wildlife habitat, and provide water for agriculture, industry, and other uses.

Summary
The project tasks are as follows:

Phase 1

• Develop feasibility concept definition and proof of concept.
• Perform background work, such as operator surveys, database searches, and literature review.
• Conduct lab experiments using synthetic brines and gases.
• Undertake lab testing of field brines and gases following the synthetic work.

Phase 2

• Proceed with prototype development and testing.
• Implement bench-scale, and, if successful, scale-up to larger prototype units.
• Determine economic feasibility prior to proceeding to Phase 3.

Phase 3

• Proceed with field demonstration and commercialization.
• Implement field trial and technology transfer to other operators.

Current Status (February 2008)
Progressing as planned. A DOE briefing is expected in May 2008. A No-Cost Extension has been requested and is currently being processed. The extension will modify the end date to December 31, 2008.

Funding
This project is funded under DOE Oil and Gas Program solicitation DE-PS26-05NT15600.

Project Start: October 1, 2005
Project End: June 30, 2008

Anticipated DOE Contribution: $414,444
Performer Contribution: $270,409 (30 percent of total)

Other Government Organizations Involved: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Contact Information
NETL – Jesse Garcia(jesse.garcia@netl.doe.gov or 918-699-2036)
BC Tech - John Boysen (bct01@aol.com or 307-742-5651)

Prototype injector