Oil & Natural Gas Projects
Exploration and Production Technologies
Demonstration of Microholes for Oil Production and Emplacement of Subsurface Seismic Instrumentation
The chief objective of this project is to field test a microhole drilling system
capable of drilling and completing small diameter wells. The wells will be drilled
with a coiled tubing rig as opposed to a conventional drilling rig to lower
overall exploration and production costs.
A second objective of the project is to evaluate new commercial drilling and
completion equipment. The Los Alamos microdrilling equipment serves as a platform
to evaluate commercial technology that is or may be appropriate for microdrilling
and completion services. By testing and evaluating as many commercial products
as possible during field operations in the drilling of micro-instrumentation
holes, the project will provide real, full-field conditions for assessing these
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)
Los Alamos, NM
Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center (RMOTC)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)
University of Wyoming
The acoustic performance of the geologic formations in the CO2 injection area
has been modeled and was used to select four well locations for CO2 flood monitoring.
Seismic arrays were selected, and the equipment needed to assemble and deploy
the arrays was procured.
The first micro-instrumentation CO2-monitoring hole was drilled and completed
in October 2004. The 808-ft well was completed with PVC casing set below 587
ft, where intermediate steel casing was cemented to isolate the Shannon formation.
The second micro-instrumentation hole was drilled to 407 ft and similarly completed.
A multi-offset, vertical seismic profile survey was conducted successfully in
one of the 800 ft microholes.
The overall objective of this project is to demonstrate the technical and economic
feasibility of a highly mobile, self-contained, microhole drilling system as
an enabling technology for commercially viable seismic-data acquisition. Succeeding
in these objectives will result in reduced access (well) cost and improved quality
of data. Air-filled microholes completed with PVC (or other nonmetallic casing)
are expected to provide the lowest noise environment possible for retrievable
The use of production and injection wells for seismic data acquisition has a
number of disadvantages. Deploying seismic sensors and other logging-type tools
interrupts field operations, resulting in loss of money through temporarily
stopped production and idle time for expensive equipment and personnel. Production
and injection wells often are not positioned in the most advantageous locations
for obtaining reservoir data. Conventional wells dedicated to seismic monitoring
are expensive to drill.
Microholes (wellbores less than 3 1/2-inch diameter) have the advantage of being
relatively inexpensive to drill, and locations and completion designs can be
selected for optimal acquisition of seismic data.
In previous DOE-funded projects, LANL has demonstrated that coiled-tubing microdrilling
of wells as small as 1 3/4 inches in diameter and as deep as 800 ft can be achieved.
The LANL team also successfully field-tested geophysical micro-instrumentation
in microholes cased with 11/4-inch tubing
The motivation to examine microholes for seismic data acquisition comes from
providers of geophysical data to the oil and gas industries that seek low-cost
access to the subsurface for the emplacement of seismic instrumentation for
a variety of purposes: conventional reflection surveys, natural and induced
seismicity mapping, vertical seismic profiling, and crosswell imaging are all
enhanced with the use of deep seismic sensors. Emplacement of seismic instrumentation
in the subsurface results in highly attenuated natural surface- and cultural
noise-reduced seismic-signal travel paths through highly attenuating surface
layers and a greatly improved signal-to-noise ratio. Conventional wells are
usually too costly, and existing wells of opportunity seldom provide the instrumentation
sites required at an acceptable cost. Microholes have the advantage of being
fit for the purpose of subsurface deployment of instrumentation in the location
required at a substantially lower cost.
This project will 1) investigate the feasibility of installing 3/4-inch coiled
tubing on the LANL coiled tubing unit to extend microhole depth capability to
1,500 ft, 2) improve the performance of the LANL low-cost, highly portable,
micro-sized cement mixing equipment and displacement pumps, 3) demonstrate a
low-cost micro-wellhead concept for production, and 4) complete a demonstration
microhole production system at RMOTC.
Current Status (July 2006)
Three monitoring wells have been drilled and completed and the high resolution seismic instrumentation has been installed in each well. The high-resolution seismic data are being processed. CO2 injection is presently scheduled to begin in 2006. This project is now completed.
Project Start: July 8, 2004
Project End: July 7, 2006
Anticipated DOE Contribution: $705,000
Performer Contribution: $0
NETL - Daniel Ferguson (email@example.com or 918-699-2047)
LANL - Jim Rutledge (firstname.lastname@example.org or 505-667-8938)
LANL - Jim Thomson (email@example.com or 505-667-1924)
Foreground: LBNL microgeophone array sonde in the deployment cable. Background:
contract vibroseis unit.
Microdrilling site at the Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3. The Los Alamos drilling
mud cleaning system (left) and coiled tubing drilling rig (right) are shown.