The goal of this effort is to reduce the technical risks and the economic uncertainty standing in the way of increased efficient industry development of the low-permeability (tight) gas resources of the Greater Green River Basin (GGRB) of Wyoming. The overall goal is to encourage development and utilization of the GGRB tight gas resources by industry.
The United States currently uses 22 Tcf of natural gas annually and the projection is that by the year 2010 that demand will increase to over 30 Tcf/year. With the majority of all of the conventional reservoirs in the U.S. already discovered, the supply of natural gas for the increased demand will have to come from unconventional reservoirs. One such unconventional source is low-permeability (tight) reservoirs and basins containing significant resources and reserves. Examples of low-permeability basins include the Greater Green River, Piceance, Wind River, Uinta, and Anadarko. The 1992 National Petroleum Council's (NPC) natural gas study concluded that 232 Tcf could be technically recovered from low-permeability sand formations. Assuming that technology improvements continued, the NPC estimated that 349 Tcf could be produced. And in their most recent study, the NPC states that ?deeper wells, deeper water and non-conventional sources will be the key to future supply.?
In an effort to help the nation meet its energy needs, DOE/NETL (then METC) issued a solicitation in 1994 asking for proposals which would help reduce the technical risks and the economic uncertainty standing in the way of efficient industry development of the low-permeability (tight) reservoirs of the Greater Green River Basin (GGBR) of Wyoming. The GGRB was selected because it was identified as having the largest gas resource potential in the Rocky Mountain area, with recent gas resource estimates for low-permeability Cretaceous and Tertiary reservoirs ranging from 1,968 Tcf in place (The Scotia Group) to 5,064 Tcf in place (USGS). The goal of the solicitation was to demonstrate that these low permeability reservoirs could be developed economically with the hope that the success of the project would stimulate the industry to start developing these resources. However, the major problem with low permeability formations is that gas production is hindered by the formations' ability to allow gas to flow to the well bore. Hence, economic production of natural gas can only occur where the flow path to the wellbore is enhanced. Therefore, this solicitation also focused on enhancing the flow path by drilling a horizontal well in an appropriate reservoir. As a result of the solicitation, Union Pacific Resources (UPR) was awarded a contract to assess the technical and economic feasibility of multiple lateral completion technology in the fluvial and marine sandstones of the deep Second Frontier Formation located in the GGRB, Sweetwater County, Wyoming.
Performer: Union Pacific Resources Company ? Project management and all research products
Fort Worth, TX 76101
Sweetwater County, WY
This technology will help ensure the availability of domestic natural gas in the U.S. for the future. The success of this project unlocks a vast resource which was once thought to be economically unrecoverable. A horizontal well has a high probability of intersecting multiple natural fractures, as demonstrated here, whereas a vertical well has a very low probability, thereby reducing the chances of success. The horizontal well which intersects natural fractures can drain a much larger area of a reservoir, which in turn will reduce the number of wells required. Less wells relate to less environmental disruptions. The Rocky Mountain region will benefit significantly from this work. A vast low permeability resource has been unlocked for future development not only in the Frontier formation, but also in deeper formations such as the Nugget and Weber. The cores, logs, and other special practices used in this project will be used as a point on the learning curve in an effort to reduce drilling costs in future wells.
Upon DOE approval of the proposed well site, UPR proceeded with Phase 2. The Stratos Federal #1 well was drilled through the Second Frontier to a total depth of 16,250 feet. In an effort to facilitate the fracture characterization portion of the project, the well was deviated starting at a depth of 13,872 feet on through the Second Frontier in an effort to increase the probability of intersecting one or more vertical fractures during drilling. The well encountered 8 gross feet and 4 net feet of fluvial channel sandstones and approximately 40 gross feet and 19 net feet of marine sandstones. Oriented cores were taken through the fluvial and marine sections of the Second Frontier to aid in the understanding of the reservoir and in designing the completion of the well. A total of 109.8 feet of core was retrieved from the well. Core porosities ranged from 3.3 to 7.3 % in the fluvial sandstones and from 3.5 to 11.4% in the marine sandstones. The unstressed horizontal permeabilities to air ranged from <0.01 to 0.25 millidarcies in the fluvial section and from <0.01 to 0.1 millidarices in the marine. Open hole logs were also run to aid in the characterization of the reservoir. The vertical well was then cased and readied for testing.
Once the vertical well was completed, it was thoroughly tested and evaluated. The contract called for cased-hole stress testing, pre-frac well testing, mini-frac, and a main ?Moxa-Type? frac. The stress tests and the pre-frac tests were performed and the results of these tests along with the various core and well log analyses demonstrated that the Second Frontier in the Stratos #1 well did not exhibit reservoir properties that would warrant the further expense of hydraulic fracture stimulations. Additional evaluation results also showed that the reservoir contained a massive clean sandstone cemented by secondary quartz with very few natural fractures, very little pronounced bedding, and very few hydrocarbon shows. The lack of open natural fractures was very detrimental to the well as an interconnected natural fracture system is needed in a low-permeability reservoir to make it economic. The few natural fractures that were identified in the cores were microfractures and were quartz-filled, therefore offering no passageway for the gas to flow. The Frontier formation as a whole in this well was very clean sandstone with very low porosity due to secondary quartz mineralization. Hydrocarbon shows were also scarce in the well and as a result the initial production from the well was only 20 Mcfd. As stated above, it was concluded from the testing results that even though the productivity of the Stratos well could be enhance by a hydraulic fracture treatment, the resulting production would not warrant the expense, as it still would only be in the few hundred Mcfd range. At this point, both DOE and UPR agreed that this was not an ideal location for a horizonal well, and that an alternate location should be sought.
During the time that the Stratos well was being drilled and in the months following, several wells were drilled through the Second Frontier on the east side of the Rock Springs Uplift. These wells were overpressured, and strong gas shows and cores taken from those wells contained both partially open and cemented natural fractures. One of those wells was the Government Union #4 well, which was drilled by Texaco for completion in a formation deeper than the Frontier formation. However, while drilling through the Frontier, the well had a very large gas show in the Frontier formation and core taken in the Frontier contained a very large open natural fracture. Texaco attempted to seal off the Frontier and complete the well in a deeper formation, however their efforts were unsuccessful. They eventually completed the well in the Frontier formation, where initial production from the well was 6 MMcfd and had continued at a steady rate. With this information known, UPR then proposed a site 1.5 miles to the northeast of the Government Union #4 as an alternate location.
Before approving the site, DOE was in a unique situation to integrate two research projects together. ARI had developed a geomechanical model under another DOE contract and was in the field testing phase of the project. DOE discussed with ARI the possibility of using the proposed UPR well location as one of their field test locations, to which ARI agreed. The significance of the geomechanical model is that it identifies high stress zones, which indicate a high likelihood of natural fractures being present. The importance of natural fractures was shown in the Stratos well and DOE wanted to be certain that natural fractures would be present in the new location. UPR was very cooperative in this ARI effort of model validation and the results indicated that there was a very high possibility of intersecting natural fractures at this proposed location. After reviewing the goemechanical results and the reservoir data from surrounding wells, DOE approved the well location.
UPR spudded the Rock Island #4H well on October 14, 1998. The vertical section was drilled to a depth of 14,487 feet at which point the vertical section was logged and cased. The well was then kicked-off to go horizontal. Drilling was very slow through the turn of the well, however very few problems were encountered. Once the well had penetrated the upper marine section of the Frontier, core was taken in the well. Drilling then proceeded at an approximate angle of 80-85 degrees from vertical to follow the formation dip. The upper marine section was approximately 15 feet thick and was separated from the lower marine section by a 4 foot coal/shale stringer. The lower marine was approximately 21 feet thick. Both the upper and lower marine sections dipped to the northeast at an 85 degree angle. The horizontal section crossed several structural faults during the drilling. UPR was able to identify these faults and keep the wellbore proceeding in the formation only by the use of their patented geosteering technology. The well was drilled to a total measured depth of 16,784 feet and a true vertical depth of 14, 953 feet. This included a lateral section of 2,297 feet, which was completed in the marine section of the Frontier formation. The lateral section was just short of the planned 2,500 feet due to a structural fault that dropped the formation approximately nine feet below the wellbore. During the drilling, 79 feet of planned 90 feet of horizontal core was retrieved from the well. It was determined that this was the deepest horizontal core ever recovered in the U.S. The core contained several open natural fractures and a FMI log identified over 400 open fractures in the horizontal section. The cores confirmed the accuracy of the FMI logging in these highly fractured formations. The initial production for the Rock Island #4H well was 13 MMcfd and the well has produced over 4.5 BCF in the first 18 months of production. The well is still on production and is currently producing 6 MMcfd. These production numbers prove that this low-permeability resource can be produced economically.
At the completion of the Rock Island #4H well, it was determined that there was approximately $250,000 uncosted remaining in the contract. UPR approached DOE with a proposal to take extra logs and core in two new wells they had planned. The additional data would aid in the regional reservoir characterization of the Frontier formation. The proposed logs and core were above what UPR would normally take during a drilling operation. UPR proposed to cost share the additional logs and core at a 50/50 rate, to which DOE agreed. Logs were then taken in two additional wells, Sidewinder #1H and Sidewinder #2H, and core was retrieved from the Sidewinder #1H. This data was used to further characterize the region.
Current Status and Remaining Tasks:
This project has been completed.
Project Start: April 28, 1995
Project End: November 30, 2001
DOE Contribution: $5,873,854
Performer Contribution: $3,799,724
NETL ? Gary L. Covatch (304-285-4589 or email@example.com)
UPR ? Frank H. Lim (817-321-7889 or firstname.lastname@example.org)
Topical Report, May 1996 - Phase 1 Site Characterization
Conference Presentation - Greater Green River Basin Production Improvement Project [PDF-77KB]
Final Report [PDF-17229KB]
Images: Fractured Core Rig on Site Core Analysis