Program Background and Project Benefits
The U.S. Department of Energy Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (RCSP) Initiative consists of seven partnerships with the purpose of determining the best approaches for permanently storing carbon dioxide (CO2) in geologic formations. Each RCSP includes stakeholders comprised of state and local agencies, private companies, electric utilities, universities, and nonprofit organizations. These partnerships are the core of a nationwide network helping to establish the most suitable technologies, regulations, and infrastructure needs for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS). The partnerships include more than 400 distinct organizations, spanning 43 states and four Canadian provinces, and are developing the framework needed to validate carbon storage technologies. The RCSPs are unique in that each one is determining which of the numerous CCUS approaches are best suited for their specific regions of the country and are also identifying regulatory and infrastructure requirements needed for future commercial deployment. Each of the RCSPs are led by one organization that manages the RCSP activities, including the characterization efforts, planning and leading the small- and large-scale injection tests, and integrating the results. The RCSP Initiative is being implemented in three phases, the Characterization Phase, Validation Phase, and Development Phase. In September 2003, the Characterization Phase began with the seven partnerships working to determine the locations of CO2 sources and to assess suitable locations for CO2 storage. The Validation Phase (2005–2013) focused on evaluating promising CO2 storage opportunities through a series of small scale field tests in the seven RCSP regions. Finally, the Development Phase (2008-2020) activities are proceeding and will continue evaluating how CO2 capture, transportation, injection, and storage can be achieved safely, permanently, and economically at large scales. These tests are providing tremendous insight regarding injectivity, resource estimation, and containment of CO2 in the various geologic formations identified by the partnerships. Results and assessments from these efforts will assist commercialization efforts for future carbon storage projects in North America.
WESTCARB’s research has resulted in compilation of significant new data on the potential for terrestrial and geologic storage technologies to be used to mitigate GHG emissions in the western region. Regional characterization efforts have provided an assessment of the sources and potential geologic storage sites for CO2 in the West Coast Region and data have been made available through an interactive portal on the WESTCARB website. The data collected from these projects have helped to better estimate CO2 storage capacity and permenance within the WESTCARB region. Project data have also been integrated with comparable data from other RCSPs to provide a source/storage site database with spatially referenced data covering most of the United States and Canada, available through the NATCARB website and NETL’s Atlas publications. This effort has also provided information to evaluate potential capacity and value-added benefits from EOR and ECBM as well as consideration of the potential for other utilization options in the region. The estimate of CO2 storage resources in the region is up to 1,124 billion metric tons for saline formations and 4 billion metric tons for oil and natural gas reservoirs. Results obtained from the field tests, laboratory studies, and modeling have been critical to developing an understanding the influence of local geologic, infrastructure, and socioeconomic/demographic conditions on the success of geologic CCUS projects. WESTCARB’s terrestrial storage research has provided unique datasets and analyses of the cost and storage potential for major terrestrial storage methods in the western region. In particular, the research has shown the critical role that forest management and wildfire prevention/minimization may have in reducing the region’s carbon emissions from catastrophic wildfires. Beyond the technical advances, WESTCARB has also played a key role in educating the public, policymakers and other stakeholders about CCUS technology and its potential applications to reduce GHG emissions.
Primary Project Goal
The primary objective of the DOE’s Carbon Storage Program is to develop technologies to safely and permanently store CO2 and reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions without adversely affecting energy use or hindering economic growth. The Programmatic goals of Carbon Storage research are: (1) estimating CO2 storage capacity in geologic formations; (2) demonstrating that 99 percent of injected CO2 remains in the injection zone(s); (3) improving efficiency of storage operations; and (4) developing Best Practices Manuals (BPMs).
WESTCARB’s overarching goal is to facilitate successful commercial-scale CCUS development in its region by: characterizing sources and geologic and terrestrial storage resources; performing regional and site-specific engineering, economic, sampling, testing, and modeling studies; and, through research and outreach activities, to identify and address CCUS implementation issues.
WESTCARB, with its partners, has three specific objectives and approaches:
Working with state agencies and universities to characterize geologic and terrestrial storage potential and capacity in the WESTCARB region based on geology and geographic criteria;
Collaborating with industry to define promising sites and facilitate the process for developing commercial-scale CCUS projects, including field, socioeconomic, and engineering studies, laboratory tests, modeling, and outreach;
Engaging policymakers and regulatory agencies to inform CCUS policy and regulatory development, including providing technical information to assist in developing methodologies to incorporate CCUS as an accepted technology for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction.
Geologic Storage Opportunities
California offers outstanding opportunities for CO2 storage because of its many deep sedimentary basins and the potential for CO2-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and other utilization options. In Oregon and Washington, sedimentary basins between the Coast and Cascade mountain ranges offer excellent storage opportunities. A series of basins in the western portions of both states contain sediments up to 20,000 feet (6,000 meters) thick. In Washington, the Puget Sound Basin also contains deep coal formations suitable for storage that also may have potential for enhanced coal bed methane (ECBM) production. In Nevada, the storage resource is distributed amongst the small basins of the Basin and Range. In Alaska, the oil and natural gas fields and sedimentary basins on the North Slope and near the Cook Inlet are of prime interest because of their proximity to sources, accessibility and opportunities for CO2-EOR. In Arizona, sediments underlying the Colorado Plateau and Tertiary Basins offer many potential storage opportunities for the state’s large coal-fired power plants and other sources. In Hawaii, the potential for storage in basalt is being evaluated. In British Columbia, there are storage opportunities in saline formations, oil and gas fields, and unmineable coal.
Northern California CO2 Reduction Project (G1)
WESTCARB and C6 Resources, LLC, conducted a site characterization study of the Montezuma Hills area in the southern Sacramento Basin, where decades of natural gas exploration, production, and storage provided initial structural and stratigraphic data from logs and seismic surveys. On this basis, the project team developed a geologic model to simulate the injection of 5,440 metric tons of CO2 into a deep saline sandstone, the Anderson Formation. Results suggested that the area would be an excellent candidate for commercial-scale CO2 storage. The area is in close proximity to large industrial and power plant sources in the San Francisco Bay area. The project was pursued successfully through the planning and permitting stages, but strategic business decisions resulted in withdrawal of C6 Resources from the project.
Arizona Utilities CO2 Storage Pilot (G2)
A characterization/injection well was drilled on Arizona Public Service Company (APS) land near the coal-fired Cholla power plant. Potential CO2 storage targets were the Naco and Martin saline carbonate formations. Due to a finding of insufficient injectivity, CO2 injection was not undertaken and the well was not completed. This result demonstrates the importance of specific site characterization studies because subsurface heterogeneity in hydrogeologic properties can critically affect local storage capacity even within formations with high regional potential.
Terrestrial Storage Opportunities
Terrestrial storage opportunities in the WESTCARB region include afforestation (tree planting); changes in forest management to increase carbon stocks; biomass storage in wetlands; beneficial use of biochar; changes in land management and development practices; improved management of forests to reduce the severity of wildfires; and, where practical, the use of forest thinnings as fuel for biomass energy facilities. WESTCARB investigated these options through studies and field pilots with partner, Winrock International, as well as many other collaborators, including local agencies and landowners. Evaluation of afforestation of range-lands with native tree species for California, Oregon, and Washington over 20-, 40-, and 80-year time periods demonstrated that, on a dollar-per-ton-CO2-equivalent basis, costs are lowest for the longer time spans because the trees store more carbon in their prime growing years and the initial costs of land preparation and planting thus are amortized over a larger quantity of stored carbon. The potential for riparian zone afforestation was explored in Arizona. In addition to carbon storage, it was found to provide ecosystem benefits such as improved water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, and recreation opportunities. However, factors such as the relatively slow growth rates and the long, thin areal distribution of riparian ecosystems make implementing such projects in Arizona economically unfeasible on the basis of carbon credits alone. Researchers also addressed the potential for afforestation in Oregon with fast-growing hybrid poplar trees, which are able to store large amounts of carbon in a relatively short period and could be harvested as biomass energy crops or as timber.
Shasta County Terrestrial Storage Project (T1)
WESTCARB’s Shasta County, California, terrestrial pilots included afforestation of marginal lands, conservation-based forest ;management, and &"ladder fuel” (i.e., stunted trees allowing ground fires to reach tree crowns) reduction coupled with use as biomass fuel to reduce GHG emissions from catastrophic wildfires and provide a net-negative carbon fuel source. For afforestation, native conifer and oak species were restored to rangelands and fire-damaged forest lands on 12 separate plots, ranging from 10 to 100 acres each. For ladder fuel reduction/biomass energy, the project tested forest management activities to reduce the potential for large GHG releases from catastrophic wildfires. Building on existing fire models, project researchers developed new methodologies for rigorous emissions baselines, quantifying expected emissions with-treatment versus baselines, and conducting measurement and monitoring activities. Fire-prone forests were treated by the landowners/managers to restore forest health by removing suppressed understory trees, brush, and other ladder fuels. Where feasible, biomass fuel was transported to a local biomass power plant to generate electricity that could offset power demand that otherwise may have been met by fossil fuels. For conservation-based forest management, the project used a partnership between a conservation group and timber companies to restore and maintain high-quality forest habitats and test the practicality and effectiveness of forest carbon accounting protocols.
Lake County Terrestrial Storage Project (T2)
The Lake County, Oregon, terrestrial pilot included ladder fuel reduction/biomass energy activities to reduce GHG emissions from catastrophic wildfires and to assess the feasibility of afforestation. Like the Shasta County pilots, this pilot tested forest management activities to reduce the potential for large GHG releases from wildfires, applying new methodologies for rigorous emissions baselines, quantifying expected emissions with-treatment versus baselines, and conducting measurement and monitoring activities. The two terrestrial pilot projects provided insight into the transferability of fire risk reduction as a CO2 emission mitigation strategy across forests of the WESTCARB region, as well as documenting how to establish baselines and measure carbon benefits. This pilot also included studies of the feasibility of planting fast-growing trees on suitable agricultural or grazing land, which could allow short rotation harvests for biomass power production.