quality guidelines

OVERVIEW
Each year the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy (FE) and the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) conduct dozens of energy system studies. Some of these studies are conducted by federal employees and others are conducted under contracts funded and managed by NETL or FE. It is useful to compare results of these studies that feature similar energy systems. Unfortunately, conducting fair and rational comparisons is often complicated by the lack of consistent analysis approach and modeling assumptions. In an effort to provide more consistency between studies, “Quality Guidelines for Energy Systems Studies” (QGESS) documents are developed.

These documents summarize the methodology employed by NETL in its assessment of power plant performance. A clear understanding of the methodology used is essential for allowing different power plant technologies to be compared on a similar basis. Though these guidelines are tailored for power plants, they can also be applied to a variety of different energy conversion plants (e.g. , coal to liquids, syngas generation, hydrogen, etc.).

This page provides abstract and links to the QGESS documents as well as links to related documents with similar objectives.

QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR ENERGY SYSTEM STUDIES FOR FOSSIL ENERGY PLANTS

  • QGESS: Performing a Techno-Economic Analysis for Power Generation Plants, July 2014, NETL/DOE-341/050214
    The QGESS: Performing a Techno-Economic Analysis for Power Generation Plants provides guidelines on performing a techno-economic analysis (TEA) of power generation processes.  The report includes guidance on preparing a design basis, performing the technical analysis, performing the economic analysis, and information that should be reported.  This guideline references numerous reports that provide examples of TEAs and provides a short description of most of the QGESS reports listed on this web page that provide useful information for specific aspects of performing a TEA. (First Quarter 2015)
  • QGESS: Process Modeling Design Parameters, May 2014, NETL/DOE-341/051314
    The QGESS: Process Modeling Design Parameters documents the process modeling assumptions most commonly used in power generation systems analysis studies and the basis for those assumptions.
    The values and ranges of values presented in this report represent assumptions that have been made in previous studies.
  • QGESS: Cost and Performance Metrics Used to Assess Carbon Utilization and Storage Technologies, February 2011, NETL/DOE-341/093013
    The QGESS: Cost and Performance Metrics Used to Assess Carbon Utilization and Storage Technologies documents metrics that were developed for use with CO2 utilization through chemical conversion processes. These metrics give simple standards of measurement to gauge performance and economics of R&D projects relative to their contemporary counterparts, and between interdisciplinary utilization fields.
  • QGESS: Carbon Dioxide Transport and Storage costs in NETL Studies, September 2013, NETL/DOE-2014/1653
    The QGESS: Carbon Dioxide Transport and Storage costs in NETL Studies [PDF-1.53MB] estimates the cost of CO2 transport and storage (T&S) in a deep saline aquifer for plant locations used in the energy system studies sponsored by NETL. Due to the variances in the geologic formations that make up saline aquifers across the United States, the cost to store CO2 can vary greatly depending on location. To account for these variances, region-specific results from NETL’s CO2 Saline Storage Cost Model are utilized to represent costs for plant locations used in NETL studies: Midwest, Texas, North Dakota, and Montana. Transport costs are calculated based on a generic 100 km (62 mi) dedicated pipeline for all regions. Storage and monitoring costs represent significant storage potential (up to 25 billion tonnes of CO2) in local sedimentary basins.
  • QGESS: Retrofit Difficulty Factors, August 2013, DOE/NETL-341/082313
    The QGESS: Retrofit Difficulty Factors [PDF-552KB] provides a methodology for estimating additional costs for retrofitting carbon capture technologies onto existing fossil power plants. 
  • QGESS: Technology Learning Curve, August 2013, DOE/NETL-341/081213
    The QGESS: Technology Learning Curve [PDF-491KB], provides a methodology for estimating Nth of a kind plant costs from first of a kind plant costs. 
  • QGESS: Cost Estimation Methodology for NETL Assessments of Power Plant Performance, April 2011, DOE/NETL-2011/1455
    The QGESS: Cost Estimation Methodology for NETL Assessments of Power Plant Performance [PDF-666KB], summarizes the cost estimation methodology employed by NETL in its assessment of power plant performance. A clear understanding of the methodology used is essential for allowing different power plant technologies to be compared on a similar basis. Though these guidelines are tailored for power plants, they can also be applied to a variety of different energy conversion plants (e.g. , coal to liquids, syngas generation, hydrogen).
  • QGESS: Detailed Coal Specifications, January 2012, NETL/DOE -401/012111
    The QGESS: Detailed Coal Specifications [PDF-1.30MB], provides data on the coal industry and detailed specifications for seven coals commonly used in energy system studies for NETL.
  • QGESS: Specifications for Selected Feedstocks, March 2012, NETL/DOE -341/011812
    The QGESS: Specifications for Selected Feedstocks [PDF-269KB], provides recommended specifications for various feedstocks that are commonly found in NETL-sponsored energy system studies. Adhering to these specifications should enhance the consistency of such studies. NETL recommends these guidelines be followed in the absence of any compelling market, project, or site-specific requirements in order to facilitate comparison of studies evaluating coal-based technologies. 
  • QGESS: CO2 Impurity Design Parameter, August 2013, NETL/DOE -341/011212
    The QGESS: CO2 Impurity Design Parameters [PDF-358KB], provides recommended impurity limits for CO2stream components for use in conceptual studies of CO2 carbon capture, utilization, and storage systems. These limits were developed from information consolidated from numerous studies and are presented by component. Impurity levels are provided for limitations of carbon steel pipelines, enhanced oil recovery (EOR), saline reservoir sequestration, and cosequestration of CO2 and H2S in saline reservoirs. 
  • QGESS: Fuel Prices for Selected Feedstocks in NETL Studies, November 2012, DOE/NETL-341/11212
    The QGESS:Fuel Prices for Selected Feedstocks in NETL Studies [PDF-738 KB] provides an estimate of the market price delivered to specific end-use areas, of four coals that are commonly used as feedstocks in the energy system studies sponsored by NETL. Also included is the estimated market price for natural gas delivered to three different regions.
  • QGESS: Capital Cost Scaling Methodology, January 2013, DOE/NETL-341/013113
    The QGESS: Capital Cost Scaling Methodology [PDF-1.10MB], provides a standard basis for scaling capital costs, with specific emphasis on scaling exponents. The intention of having a standardized document is to provide guidelines for proper procedures to reduce the potential of errors and increase credibility through consistency. This document contains a listing of frequently used pieces of equipment and their corresponding scaling exponent for various plant types, along with their ranges of applicability. This document also details the equations to be used with each exponent.
  • QGESS: Methane Emissions from Mining Illinois Basin Coals, September 2010, DOE/NETL-400/2010/1445
    The QGESS: Methane Emissions for Mining Illinois Basin Coals [PDF-330 KB], explores methane content and emissions associated with mining Illinois Basin coals such as Illinois No. 6. Both coal methane content and specific emissions from mining are explored. Methane emissions resulting from the release of methane trapped in coal beds can have a significant impact on the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with coal production. These emissions vary dramatically by coal rank, specific seam, and seam depth and thickness.

RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR ENERGY SYSTEM STUDIES

  • "A Proposed Methodology for CO2 Capture and Storage Cost Estimates", September 2013
    This paper recommends a path forward to improve and systematize the estimation and communications of carbon capture and storage (CCS) costs. The paper resulted from a series of CCS Cost Workshops that were attended by representatives from several international stakeholder organizations, including DOE/NETL.
StayConnected Facebook Twitter LinkedIn RssFeed YouTube